Notes to quiz
questions, each one tied to the line it came from.

Notes that make a good quiz, and notes that don't

The tool turns a sentence's claim into a question, so it needs sentences that make a claim. Take the line this page's own "Generate an example" button fills the box with: "Photosynthesis converts light energy into chemical energy inside chloroplasts." That is a subject, a verb and a specific outcome, and a question can be built from any piece of it, with the sentence itself standing as the source line underneath.

Now write the same idea the way most of us actually keep it in a revision doc: "Photosynthesis — light energy, chloroplasts." Same information, roughly, but the claim is gone. There is no verb to ask about and no stated relationship between the pieces, so a question drawn from it either has to reconstruct a sentence that was never written, or comes back thinner than the notes were.

You do not have to rewrite a whole document before pasting it in. But if a section of your notes is already a bulleted skeleton, the fastest fix is not more bullets. It is writing the two or three sentences that skeleton was standing in for, once, and pasting those instead.

Read the question before you trust it

Multiple choice has a specific failure mode: a wrong option can read as plausibly as the right one, especially at one in the morning. Every question here carries the line of your notes it was written from, and opening it highlights that sentence inside the text you pasted, not a paraphrase of it.

That is the check worth using on the question that feels slightly off, rather than rereading the whole page again. If the source line does not actually say what the question claims, that is the tool getting it wrong, not you misremembering the material, and it is faster to catch there than in an exam room.

A two minute closed book check beats another reread

Rereading a page tells you the explanation still makes sense. Answering a question about it with the notes closed tells you something rereading cannot: whether the idea is actually retrievable, on its own, without the page in front of you. That gap is usually invisible until something closed-book asks for it directly.

We wrote about that trade-off at more length on the active recall versus rereading post. The short version: a quiz from your own notes is one way to run that check, not the only one, and it works best on material you have already read once.

What this tool won't do

• Multiple choice only, in quiz mode. No short answer, no fill-in-the-blank grading, four options and a source line.
• Two generations a day, free, resetting at midnight UTC. It is not a trial that runs out.
• 25,000 characters read on the free tier, roughly a long chapter. Longer is a Pro waitlist feature, not a silent trim.
• Questions are only as good as the notes. Fragment-heavy sections give the model less of a claim to work from, and the questions come out thinner because of it, not because of a bug.
• No saved history across devices. A refresh keeps your last quiz in this browser; there is no account for it to follow you to another one.

Who else shows up for this search

revisely.com, quizgecko.com, mindgrasp.ai and jungleai.com all rank here too, and each takes its own route from source material to a quiz. We have not run every one of them side by side with ours, so we are not going to pretend to score them here.

This page is for a narrower case: you already condensed a chapter or a lecture down into notes, and you want a quiz built from exactly those notes, with a source line under every question, rather than a fresh summary of a document you have not written yet.